Erratum: Evolution of intrinsic scatter in the SFR-stellar mass correlation at 0.5 < z < 3 (Astrophysical Journal Letters (2016) 820 (L1) DOI: 10.3847/2041-8205/820/1/l1)

Peter Kurczynski, Eric Gawiser, Viviana Acquaviva, Eric F. Bell, Avishai Dekel, Duilia F.De Mello, Henry C. Ferguson, Jonathan P. Gardner, Norman A. Grogin, Yicheng Guo, Philip F. Hopkins, Anton M. Koekemoer, David C. Koo, Seong Kook Lee, Bahram Mobasher, Joel R. Primack, Marc Rafelski, Emmaris Soto, Harry I. Teplitz

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

The published article contains values in Table 1 and Figure 3 that were found to be in error. These values include the intercepts b and b9 (columns 4 and 5) for tabulated values of all redshift-binned samples. Analyses of SFR-M model parameters in this Letter were performed on median rescaled values of the data throughout. For reporting, the corresponding median rescaled parameter estimates should have been converted back to unscaled values; however, the b and b9 values reported in Table 1 were not converted. This error did not affect the best-fit models shown in Figure 1 of the published article. That figure was made with the correct, rescaled parameter estimates. We include here a corrected version of Table 1 and Figure 3, for which the middle panel plots the b9 values at each binned redshift. The correction does not affect the conclusions of the Letter; we include the corrected values here for comparison to the literature. (Figure Presented).

Original languageEnglish
Article numberL42
JournalAstrophysical Journal Letters
Volume864
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 Sep 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Evolution of intrinsic scatter in the SFR-stellar mass correlation at 0.5 < z < 3 (Astrophysical Journal Letters (2016) 820 (L1) DOI: 10.3847/2041-8205/820/1/l1)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this