TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum
T2 - TLR4/MD-2 activation by a synthetic agonist with no similarity to LPS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2016) 113 (E884–E893) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1525639113)
AU - Wang, Ying
AU - Su, Lijing
AU - Morin, Matthew D.
AU - Jones, Brian T.
AU - Whitby, Landon R.
AU - Surakattula, Murali M.R.P.
AU - Huang, Hua
AU - Shi, Hexin
AU - Choi, Jin Huk
AU - Wang, Kuan Wen
AU - Moresco, Eva Marie Y.
AU - Berger, Michael
AU - Zhan, Xiaoming
AU - Zhang, Hong
AU - Boger, Dale L.
AU - Beutler, Bruce
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/6/15
Y1 - 2021/6/15
N2 - Correction for “TLR4/MD-2 activation by a synthetic agonist with no similarity to LPS,” by Ying Wang, Lijing Su, Matthew D. Morin, Brian T. Jones, Landon R. Whitby, Murali M. R. P. Surakattula, Hua Huang, Hexin Shi, Jin Huk Choi, Kuan-wen Wang, Eva Marie Y. Moresco, Michael Berger, Xiaoming Zhan, Hong Zhang, Dale L. Boger, and Bruce Beutler, which was first published February 1, 2016; 10.1073/pnas.1525639113 (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E884–E893). Recently, Dr. Yibo Wang, Dr. Hongshuang Wang, and Professor Xiaohui Wang, from the Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, brought to our attention that R-Neoseptin-3 (the inactive enantiomer) was modeled into the crystal structure of TLR4/MD-2/Neoseptin-3 obtained from co-crystallization of TLR4/MD-2 with the active enantiomer S-Neoseptin-3, published in PNAS. The electron density map does not have high enough resolution (2.57 Å) to distinguish between R- and S-enantiomers of Neoseptin-3. S-Neo-3A fits the density data as well as the modeled R-Neo-3A. S-Neo-3B fits the density data slightly better than R-Neo-3B at the phenyl group. The overall conformations of the two S-Neoseptin-3 molecules are extremely similar to those of the two R-Neoseptin-3 molecules modeled in the structure (Fig. 5). The key interactions between S-Neoseptin-3 and TLR4/MD-2 are the same as those between the modeled R-Neoseptin-3 and TLR4/MD-2 (Fig. 6). Our conclusions as to how activation of TLR4/MD2 is induced by S-Neoseptin-3 have not changed. We have replaced the coordinates of the crystal structure of TLR4/MD-2/R-Neoseptin-3 with the coordinates of TLR4/MD2/S-Neoseptin-3 in Protein Data Bank under the same accession code 5IJC. The authors note that Figs. 5 and 6 in the main article and Fig. S2 in the SI Appendix appeared incorrectly. The corrected main figures and their legends appear below. The SI Appendix has been corrected online. (Figure Presented).
AB - Correction for “TLR4/MD-2 activation by a synthetic agonist with no similarity to LPS,” by Ying Wang, Lijing Su, Matthew D. Morin, Brian T. Jones, Landon R. Whitby, Murali M. R. P. Surakattula, Hua Huang, Hexin Shi, Jin Huk Choi, Kuan-wen Wang, Eva Marie Y. Moresco, Michael Berger, Xiaoming Zhan, Hong Zhang, Dale L. Boger, and Bruce Beutler, which was first published February 1, 2016; 10.1073/pnas.1525639113 (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E884–E893). Recently, Dr. Yibo Wang, Dr. Hongshuang Wang, and Professor Xiaohui Wang, from the Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, brought to our attention that R-Neoseptin-3 (the inactive enantiomer) was modeled into the crystal structure of TLR4/MD-2/Neoseptin-3 obtained from co-crystallization of TLR4/MD-2 with the active enantiomer S-Neoseptin-3, published in PNAS. The electron density map does not have high enough resolution (2.57 Å) to distinguish between R- and S-enantiomers of Neoseptin-3. S-Neo-3A fits the density data as well as the modeled R-Neo-3A. S-Neo-3B fits the density data slightly better than R-Neo-3B at the phenyl group. The overall conformations of the two S-Neoseptin-3 molecules are extremely similar to those of the two R-Neoseptin-3 molecules modeled in the structure (Fig. 5). The key interactions between S-Neoseptin-3 and TLR4/MD-2 are the same as those between the modeled R-Neoseptin-3 and TLR4/MD-2 (Fig. 6). Our conclusions as to how activation of TLR4/MD2 is induced by S-Neoseptin-3 have not changed. We have replaced the coordinates of the crystal structure of TLR4/MD-2/R-Neoseptin-3 with the coordinates of TLR4/MD2/S-Neoseptin-3 in Protein Data Bank under the same accession code 5IJC. The authors note that Figs. 5 and 6 in the main article and Fig. S2 in the SI Appendix appeared incorrectly. The corrected main figures and their legends appear below. The SI Appendix has been corrected online. (Figure Presented).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107981106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.2106360118
DO - 10.1073/pnas.2106360118
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.comment???
C2 - 34099570
AN - SCOPUS:85107981106
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 118
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 24
M1 - e2106360118
ER -