Erratum to Peer et al. (2021) Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research

Eyal Peer*, David Rothschild, Andrew Gordon, Ekaterina Damer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

This erratum reports on a technical error that was discovered in Study 2 of Peer et al. (2021). Because of this technical error, some specific findings on participants’ proclivity for dishonesty reported in the paper have been found incorrect. We detail the error, which only affected female participants, and its impact on the findings and report on the reanalyzed findings accounting for the error. The new findings do not change the conclusions provided in the paper, and show again that participants from MTurk are more likely to engage in dishonest behavior than participants from Prolific or CloudResearch.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)2618-2620
Number of pages3
JournalBehavior Research Methods
Volume54
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Keywords

  • Data quality
  • Erratum
  • Online research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to Peer et al. (2021) Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this