Erratum to Peer et al. (2021) Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research

Eyal Peer; David Rothschild; Andrew Gordon; Ekaterina Damer

doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01909-1

Erratum to Peer et al. (2021) Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research

Eyal Peer^*, David Rothschild, Andrew Gordon, Ekaterina Damer

^*Corresponding author for this work

Federmann School of Public Policy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

This erratum reports on a technical error that was discovered in Study 2 of Peer et al. (2021). Because of this technical error, some specific findings on participants’ proclivity for dishonesty reported in the paper have been found incorrect. We detail the error, which only affected female participants, and its impact on the findings and report on the reanalyzed findings accounting for the error. The new findings do not change the conclusions provided in the paper, and show again that participants from MTurk are more likely to engage in dishonest behavior than participants from Prolific or CloudResearch.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2618-2620
Number of pages	3
Journal	Behavior Research Methods
Volume	54
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01909-1
State	Published - Oct 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Keywords

Data quality
Erratum
Online research

Access to Document

10.3758/s13428-022-01909-1

Cite this

@article{139c20932dc1427c9fb3c8b7992c303b,

title = "Erratum to Peer et al. (2021) Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research",

abstract = "This erratum reports on a technical error that was discovered in Study 2 of Peer et al. (2021). Because of this technical error, some specific findings on participants{\textquoteright} proclivity for dishonesty reported in the paper have been found incorrect. We detail the error, which only affected female participants, and its impact on the findings and report on the reanalyzed findings accounting for the error. The new findings do not change the conclusions provided in the paper, and show again that participants from MTurk are more likely to engage in dishonest behavior than participants from Prolific or CloudResearch.",

keywords = "Data quality, Erratum, Online research",

author = "Eyal Peer and David Rothschild and Andrew Gordon and Ekaterina Damer",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Psychonomic Society, Inc.",

year = "2022",

month = oct,

doi = "10.3758/s13428-022-01909-1",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "54",

pages = "2618--2620",

journal = "Behavior Research Methods",

issn = "1554-351X",

publisher = "Springer Nature",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum to Peer et al. (2021) Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research

AU - Peer, Eyal

AU - Rothschild, David

AU - Gordon, Andrew

AU - Damer, Ekaterina

PY - 2022/10

Y1 - 2022/10

N2 - This erratum reports on a technical error that was discovered in Study 2 of Peer et al. (2021). Because of this technical error, some specific findings on participants’ proclivity for dishonesty reported in the paper have been found incorrect. We detail the error, which only affected female participants, and its impact on the findings and report on the reanalyzed findings accounting for the error. The new findings do not change the conclusions provided in the paper, and show again that participants from MTurk are more likely to engage in dishonest behavior than participants from Prolific or CloudResearch.

AB - This erratum reports on a technical error that was discovered in Study 2 of Peer et al. (2021). Because of this technical error, some specific findings on participants’ proclivity for dishonesty reported in the paper have been found incorrect. We detail the error, which only affected female participants, and its impact on the findings and report on the reanalyzed findings accounting for the error. The new findings do not change the conclusions provided in the paper, and show again that participants from MTurk are more likely to engage in dishonest behavior than participants from Prolific or CloudResearch.

KW - Data quality

KW - Erratum

KW - Online research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140275097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13428-022-01909-1

DO - 10.3758/s13428-022-01909-1

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???

C2 - 35794415

AN - SCOPUS:85140275097

SN - 1554-351X

VL - 54

SP - 2618

EP - 2620

JO - Behavior Research Methods

JF - Behavior Research Methods

IS - 5

ER -

Erratum to Peer et al. (2021) Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this