Abstract
The proof of the main theorem in the paper “The Tracy–Widom law for some sparse random matrices”, published in J. Stat. Phys. 136 (2009), no. 5, 834–841, contains a serious mistake, and Lemma 5 cannot be true as stated. For example, the probability that the graph is not connected tends to zero slower than Eq. 4 would imply. I am grateful to Charles Bordenave and Sandrine Péeché who brought this to my attention. In addition the e-mail address andORCIDIDof the corresponding author has been updated with this erratum.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1343 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Journal of Statistical Physics |
| Volume | 166 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 1 Mar 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to: The Tracy–Widom Law for Some Sparse Random Matrices (Journal of Statistical Physics, (2009), 136, 5, (834-841), 10.1007/s10955-009-9813-2)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver