'Ethnic cleansing' bleaches the atrocities of genocide

Rony Blum*, Gregory H. Stanton, Shira Sagi, Elihu D. Richter

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Genocide has been the leading cause of preventable violent death in the 20th-21st century, taking even more lives than war. The term 'ethnic cleansing' is used as a euphemism for genocide despite it having no legal status. Like 'Judenrein' and 'racial hygiene' in Nazi medicine, it expropriates pseudo-medical terminology to justify massacre. Use of the term reifies a dehumanized view of the victims as sources of filth and disease, and propagates the reversed social ethics of the perpetrators. Timelines for recent genocides (Bosnia, 1991-1996, 200 000; Kosovo 1998-2000, 10 000-20 000; Rwanda, 1994, 800 000; Darfur 2002-2006, >400 000) show that its use bears no relationship to death tolls or the scale of atrocity. Bystanders' use of the term 'ethnic cleansing' signals the lack of will to stop genocide, resulting in huge increases in deaths, and undermines international legal obligations to acknowledge genocide. The term 'ethnic cleansing' corrupts observation, interpretation, ethical judgment and decision-making, thereby undermining the aim of public health. Public health should lead the way in expunging the term 'ethnic cleansing' from official use. 'Ethnic cleansing' bleaches the atrocities of genocide, leading to inaction in preventing current and future genocides.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)204-209
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Public Health
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of ''Ethnic cleansing' bleaches the atrocities of genocide'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this