Abstract
As gateways into accessing the past, and catalogues of the cultures—and their biases—that we inherit, there are various research possibilities and limitations when considering library and museum online collections as sources of data. This study analyses different perspectives on how Jewish and Armenian ethnic minorities are represented by digital online collections of major historical museums. We document that the representation of concepts is skewed due to acquisition practices, augmented by the socio-technical infrastructures of the two museums under study. We show skews in the representation determined by major object groups (e.g. several thousand objects of the same type from a single archaeological expedition). Finally, we demonstrate that analysis of semi-structured data of museum catalogues presents major processing difficulties due to the multiple meanings of the same concept. We argue that the analysis of museum catalogues should include the knowledge of socio-technical contexts of data creation, such as metadata and lengthier structures, such as paradata or historical interpretation, which may add depth and meaning to subsequent analysis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | i123-i150 |
| Journal | Digital Scholarship in the Humanities |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | Special Issue: ‘Digital Humanities 2023: Collaboration as Opp... |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of EADH. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].
Keywords
- bias
- data creation
- ethnic minorities
- museums
- paradata
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ethnic minorities in online museum collections: skews and bias in digital material culture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver