Evaluating g-ratio weighted changes in the corpus callosum as a function of age and sex

Shai Berman, Kathryn L. West, Mark D. Does, Jason D. Yeatman, Aviv A. Mezer*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recent years have seen a growing interest in relating MRI measurements to the structural-biophysical properties of white matter fibers. The fiber g-ratio, defined as the ratio between the inner and outer radii of the axon myelin sheath, is an important structural property of white matter, affecting signal conduction. Recently proposed modeling methods that use a combination of quantitative-MRI signals, enable a measurement of the fiber g-ratio in vivo. Here we use an MRI-based g-ratio estimation to observe the variance of the g-ratio within the corpus callosum, and evaluate sex and age related differences. To estimate the g-ratio we used a model (Stikov et al., 2011; Duval et al., 2017) based on two different WM microstructure parameters: the relative amounts of myelin (myelin volume fraction, MVF) and fibers (fiber volume fraction, FVF) in a voxel. We derived the FVF from the fractional anisotropy (FA), and estimated the MVF by using the lipid and macromolecular tissue volume (MTV), calculated from the proton density (Mezer et al., 2013). In comparison to other methods of estimating the MVF, MTV represents a stable parameter with a straightforward route of acquisition. To establish our model, we first compared histological MVF measurements (West et al., 2016) with the MRI derived MTV. We then implemented our model on a large database of 92 subjects (44 males), aged 7 to 81, in order to evaluate age and sex related changes within the corpus callosum. Our results show that the MTV provides a good estimation of MVF for calculating g-ratio, and produced values from the corpus callosum that correspond to those found in animals ex vivo and are close to the theoretical optimum, as well as to published in vivo data. Our results demonstrate that the MTV derived g-ratio provides a simple and reliable in vivo g-ratio-weighted (GR*) measurement in humans. In agreement with theoretical predictions, and unlike other tissue parameters measured with MRI, the g-ratio estimations were found to be relatively stable with age, and we found no support for a significant sexual dimorphism with age.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)304-313
Number of pages10
JournalNeuroImage
Volume182
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Nov 2018

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We acknowledge R. Schurr for helpful advice and feedback. This work was supported ISF grant 0399306 , awarded to A.A.M, by NSF/SBE-BSF ( NSF no. 1551330 and BSF no. 2015608 ) awarded to A.A.M by Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD) Young Investigator Grant from the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation awarded to A.A.M and J.D.Y, and NIH grant R01EB019980 awarded to M.D.D. We thank J. Gomez and K. Grill-Spector for providing data for testing reproducibility, their work was supported by NIH RO1EY02988-A1 . We also thank B. Wandell for data collection, which was supported by NSF / BCS-1228397 and NIH EY015000 .

Funding Information:
We acknowledge R. Schurr for helpful advice and feedback. This work was supported ISF grant 0399306, awarded to A.A.M, by NSF/SBE-BSF (NSF no. 1551330 and BSF no. 2015608) awarded to A.A.M by Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD) Young Investigator Grant from the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation awarded to A.A.M and J.D.Y, and NIH grant R01EB019980 awarded to M.D.D. We thank J. Gomez and K. Grill-Spector for providing data for testing reproducibility, their work was supported by NIH RO1EY02988-A1. We also thank B. Wandell for data collection, which was supported by NSF/BCS-1228397 and NIH EY015000.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.

Keywords

  • Age
  • Corpus callosum
  • Sex
  • g-ratio

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating g-ratio weighted changes in the corpus callosum as a function of age and sex'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this