Evaluation of a multicenter ethics objective structured clinical examination

Peter A. Singer*, Anja Robb, Robert Cohen, Geoffrey Norman, Jeffrey Turnbull

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a six-station ethics objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) on a volunteer sample of 66 medical students and 33 residents from three Ontario medical schools. The internal consistency reliability was 0.46 and the median interrater reliability was 0.675 (range 0.30 to 0.89). The residents' scores were higher than those of the medical students (F=2.24, 0.046). Also, the scores differed among the three schools (F=3.19, p=0.0004). The ethics OSCE has adequate interrater reliability and construct validity, but low internal consistency reliability. There are differences among the schools that may assist in ethics curriculum evaluation and development

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)690-692
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume9
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1994
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • curriculum development
  • ethics
  • objective structured clinical examination
  • performance assessment
  • residents
  • students

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of a multicenter ethics objective structured clinical examination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this