Abstract
Scholarly efforts to identify core design features for effective professional development (PD) efforts have rapidly grown in the last two decades. Based on extensive literature reviews, meta analyses and large-scale quantitative studies, scholars have arrived at short lists of core design principles for effective PD programs. These design principles are presented as based on strong evidence from large-scale, replicated and rigorous research studies, and as at the heart of consensus among PD scholars. In the present essay, we appraise the quality of the evidence on which this claim is based. We identify several major flaws in the research base on which such claims are based and conclude that, overall, the evidence is weak and claims about strong evidence-based findings is misleading. Additional reservations about this research program are discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences |
Subtitle of host publication | The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2020 - Conference Proceedings |
Editors | Melissa Gresalfi, Ilana Seidel Horn |
Publisher | International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS) |
Pages | 2046-2052 |
Number of pages | 7 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781732467286 |
State | Published - 2020 |
Event | 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2020 - Nashville, United States Duration: 19 Jun 2020 → 23 Jun 2020 |
Publication series
Name | Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL |
---|---|
Volume | 4 |
ISSN (Print) | 1573-4552 |
Conference
Conference | 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2020 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United States |
City | Nashville |
Period | 19/06/20 → 23/06/20 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS). All rights reserved.