Evidence of change of intention in picking situations

Ariel Furstenberg*, Assaf Breska, Haim Sompolinsky, Leon Y. Deouell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations


Intending to perform an action and then immediately executing it is a mundane process. The cognitive and neural mechanisms involved in this process of “proximal” intention formation and execution, in the face of multiple options to choose from, are not clear, however. Especially, it is not clear how intentions are formed when the choice makes no difference. Here we used behavioral and electrophysiological measures to investigate the temporal dynamics of proximal intention formation and “change of intention” in a free picking scenario, in which the alternatives are on a par for the participant. Participants pressed a right or left button following either an instructive visible arrow cue or a visible neutral “free-choice” cue, both preceded by a masked arrow prime. The goal of the prime was to induce a bias toward pressing the left or right button. Presumably, when the choice is arbitrary, such bias should determine the decision. EEG lateralized readiness potentials and EMG measurements revealed that the prime indeed induced an intention to move in one direction. However, we discovered a signature of “change of intention” in both the Instructed and Free-choice decisions. These results suggest that, even in arbitrary choices, biases present in the neural system for choosing one or another option may be overruled and point to a curious “picking deliberation” phenomenon. We discuss a possible neural scenario that could explain this phenomenon.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)2133-2146
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Issue number11
StatePublished - 3 Nov 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.


Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence of change of intention in picking situations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this