Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Home
Approve / Request updates on publications
Home
Profiles
Research units
Research output
Prizes
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Evidently Not: Why Confessions Are Excluded in Jewish Criminal Jurisprudence
David C. Flatto
*
*
Corresponding author for this work
Department of Jewish Thought
Law
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
1
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evidently Not: Why Confessions Are Excluded in Jewish Criminal Jurisprudence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Comparative Analysis
50%
Confession
100%
Criminal
50%
Criminal Adjudication
50%
Criminal Jurisprudence
100%
Criminal Procedure
50%
Early Modern Period
50%
Jewish
100%
Jewish Law
100%
Jurisprudence
50%
Justice
50%
Legal Approach
50%
Legal Perspective
50%
Legal Practice
50%
Legal Problems
50%
Legal System
50%
Modern Legal Systems
50%
Right to Silence
50%
Rule of Law
50%
Scholarly Attention
50%
Self-incrimination
50%
Arts and Humanities
Administration of Justice
50%
Confession
100%
Dilemma
50%
Halakha Law
100%
Judaism
100%
Pursuit
50%
Rabbinic
50%
Rule of Law
50%
Social Sciences
Modern Legal System
50%