Evolution of Bow-Tie Architectures in Biology

Tamar Friedlander, Avraham E. Mayo, Tsvi Tlusty, Uri Alon*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

84 Scopus citations

Abstract

Bow-tie or hourglass structure is a common architectural feature found in many biological systems. A bow-tie in a multi-layered structure occurs when intermediate layers have much fewer components than the input and output layers. Examples include metabolism where a handful of building blocks mediate between multiple input nutrients and multiple output biomass components, and signaling networks where information from numerous receptor types passes through a small set of signaling pathways to regulate multiple output genes. Little is known, however, about how bow-tie architectures evolve. Here, we address the evolution of bow-tie architectures using simulations of multi-layered systems evolving to fulfill a given input-output goal. We find that bow-ties spontaneously evolve when the information in the evolutionary goal can be compressed. Mathematically speaking, bow-ties evolve when the rank of the input-output matrix describing the evolutionary goal is deficient. The maximal compression possible (the rank of the goal) determines the size of the narrowest part of the network—that is the bow-tie. A further requirement is that a process is active to reduce the number of links in the network, such as product-rule mutations, otherwise a non-bow-tie solution is found in the evolutionary simulations. This offers a mechanism to understand a common architectural principle of biological systems, and a way to quantitate the effective rank of the goals under which they evolved.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1004055
JournalPLoS Computational Biology
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 23 Mar 2015
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Friedlander et al.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evolution of Bow-Tie Architectures in Biology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this