Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Experimental Economics and the Theory of Finance

  • Haim Levy*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Experimental findings and in particular Prospect Theory and Cumulative Prospect Theory contradict Expected Utility Theory, which in turn may have a direct implication to theoretical models in finance and economics. We show growing evidence against Cumulative Prospect Theory. Moreover, even if one accepts the experimental results of Cumulative Prospect Theory, we show that most theoretical models in finance are robust. In particular, the CAPM is intact even if investors make decisions based on change of wealth, employ decision weights, and are risk-seeking in the negative domain.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEncyclopedia of Finance
PublisherSpringer US
Pages395-410
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781461453604
ISBN (Print)9781461453598
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2013
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013.

Keywords

  • Certainty effect
  • Configural weights
  • Cumulative prospect theory
  • Decision weights
  • Expected utility
  • Markowitz stochastic dominance
  • Prospect stochastic dominance
  • Prospect theory
  • Stochastic dominance
  • Value function

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Experimental Economics and the Theory of Finance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this