Abstract
Experimental findings and in particular Prospect Theory and Cumulative Prospect Theory contradict Expected Utility Theory, which in turn may have a direct implication to theoretical models in finance and economics. We show growing evidence against Cumulative Prospect Theory. Moreover, even if one accepts the experimental results of Cumulative Prospect Theory, we show that most theoretical models in finance are robust. In particular, the CAPM is intact even if investors make decisions based on change of wealth, employ decision weights, and are risk-seeking in the negative domain.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Encyclopedia of Finance |
| Publisher | Springer US |
| Pages | 395-410 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781461453604 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781461453598 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2013 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013.
Keywords
- Certainty effect
- Configural weights
- Cumulative prospect theory
- Decision weights
- Expected utility
- Markowitz stochastic dominance
- Prospect stochastic dominance
- Prospect theory
- Stochastic dominance
- Value function
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Experimental Economics and the Theory of Finance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver