Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Experimental findings on god as an attachment figure: Normative processes and moderating effects of internal working models

  • Pehr Granqvist*
  • , Mario Mikulincer
  • , Vered Gewirtz
  • , Phillip R. Shaver
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

102 Scopus citations

Abstract

Four studies examined implications of attachment theory for psychological aspects of religion among Israeli Jews. Study 1 replicated previous correlational findings indicating correspondence among interpersonal attachment orientations, attachment to God, and image of God. Studies 2-4 were subliminal priming experiments, which documented both normative and individual-difference effects. Regarding normative effects, findings indicated that threat priming heightened cognitive access to God-related concepts in a lexical decision task (Study 2); priming with "God" heightened cognitive access to positive, secure base-related concepts in the same task (Study 3); and priming with a religious symbol caused neutral material to be better liked (Study 4). Regarding individual differences, interpersonal attachment-related avoidance reduced the normative effects (i.e., avoidant participants had lower implicit access to God as a safe haven and secure base). Findings were mostly independent of level of religiousness. The present experiments considerably extend the psychological literature on connections between attachment constructs and aspects of religion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)804-818
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume103
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Attachment
  • God
  • Implicit processes
  • Internal working models
  • Religion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Experimental findings on god as an attachment figure: Normative processes and moderating effects of internal working models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this