Abstract
The psychological aftermath of participation in war was examined for two groups of Israeli combat veterans, both of whom had participated in two wars. Soldiers who experienced a psychological breakdown (combat stress reaction [CSR]) in the first war but not in the second (n = 30) were compared to soldiers who did not sustain a CSR in either war (n = 37). The former group had higher PTSD rates, more posttraumatic symptoms, a higher overall level of psychiatric distress, and higher levels of instrusion and avoidance. The two groups also differed in self-expectations regarding future wars. No differences in social functioning, somatic complaints, or perceived self-efficacy in combat were observed. These findings indicate that even for veterans who had apparently recovered from a breackdown in the first war and went on to cope successfully in a subsequent war, the psychological scars created by a CSR do not really heal.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 141-145 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Anxiety Disorders |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1990 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exposure to recurrent combat stress: Can successful coping in a second war heal combat-related PTSD from the past?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver