Expression of the entoconulid (sixth cusp) on mandibular molar teeth of an Australian aboriginal population

Grant Townsend*, Hiroyuki Yamada, Patricia Smith

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

The expression and genetic basis of the entoconulid (sixth cusp) on mandibular molars were examined in a geographically isolated group of aboriginals from Yuendumu in the Northern Territory of Australia. Four grades of trait expression, ranging from trace to small, medium, and large cusps, were defined on dental casts of 399 subjects. Frequencies of occurrence were among the highest reported in human populations. Approximately 80% of dm2s showed the trait, whereas frequencies in the permanent dentition ranged from around 50% on M2 to 70% on M1 and 80% on M3. The degree of expression increased distally along the molar series, with only 3% of dm2s showing large cusps compared with 25% of M3s. Fluctuating asymmetry was highest for M2 and lowest for dm2. No strong evidence for sexual dimorphism in occurrence or degree of expression was found. Based on a quasi‐continuous threshold model, a genetic contribution to entoconulid variability was observed that was strongest for M1. Significant associations were noted between entoconulid expression on mandibular molars and metaconule expression on maxillary molars, indicating that similar developmental mechanisms may influence these traits. The entoconulid and the metaconule both provide additional bulk on the distal occlusal surface of molar teeth, an area subjected to early wear during mastication in aboriginals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-274
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
Volume82
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1990

Keywords

  • Australian Aboriginals
  • Dental morphology
  • Genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Expression of the entoconulid (sixth cusp) on mandibular molar teeth of an Australian aboriginal population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this