TY - JOUR
T1 - External Quality Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Sequencing
T2 - an ESGMD-SSM Pilot Trial across 15 European Laboratories
AU - Wegner, Fanny
AU - Roloff, Tim
AU - Huber, Michael
AU - Cordey, Samuel
AU - Ramette, Alban
AU - Gerth, Yannick
AU - Bertelli, Claire
AU - Stange, Madlen
AU - Seth-Smith, Helena M.B.
AU - Mari, Alfredo
AU - Leuzinger, Karoline
AU - Cerutti, Lorenzo
AU - Harshman, Keith
AU - Xenarios, Ioannis
AU - Le Mercier, Philippe
AU - Bittel, Pascal
AU - Neuenschwander, Stefan
AU - Opota, Onya
AU - Fuchs, Jonas
AU - Panning, Marcus
AU - Michel, Charlotte
AU - Hallin, Marie
AU - Demuyser, Thomas
AU - De Mendonca, Ricardo
AU - Savelkoul, Paul
AU - Dingemans, Jozef
AU - van der Veer, Brian
AU - Boers, Stefan A.
AU - Claas, Eric C.J.
AU - Coolen, Jordy P.M.
AU - Melchers, Willem J.G.
AU - Gunell, Marianne
AU - Kallonen, Teemu
AU - Vuorinen, Tytti
AU - Hakanen, Antti J.
AU - Bernhoff, Eva
AU - Hetland, Marit Andrea Klokkhammer
AU - Berman, Hadar Golan
AU - Adar, Sheera
AU - Moran-Gilad, Jacob
AU - Wolf, Dana G.
AU - Leib, Stephen L.
AU - Nolte, Oliver
AU - Kaiser, Laurent
AU - Schmutz, Stefan
AU - Kufner, Verena
AU - Zaheri, Maryam
AU - Trkola, Alexandra
AU - Aamot, Hege Vangstein
AU - Hirsch, Hans H.
AU - Greub, Gilbert
AU - Egli, Adrian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Wegner et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
PY - 2022/1/19
Y1 - 2022/1/19
N2 - This first pilot trial on external quality assessment (EQA) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) whole-genome sequencing, initiated by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Genomic and Molecular Diagnostics (ESGMD) and the Swiss Society for Microbiology (SSM), aims to build a framework between laboratories in order to improve pathogen surveillance sequencing. Ten samples with various viral loads were sent out to 15 clinical laboratories that had free choice of sequencing methods and bioinformatic analyses. The key aspects on which the individual centers were compared were the identification of (i) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and indels, (ii) Pango lineages, and (iii) clusters between samples. The participating laboratories used a wide array of methods and analysis pipelines. Most were able to generate whole genomes for all samples. Genomes were sequenced to various depths (up to a 100-fold difference across centers). There was a very good consensus regarding the majority of reporting criteria, but there were a few discrepancies in lineage and cluster assignments. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in variant calling. The main reasons for discrepancies were missing data, bioinformatic choices, and interpretation of data. The pilot EQA was overall a success. It was able to show the high quality of participating laboratories and provide valuable feedback in cases where problems occurred, thereby improving the sequencing setup of laboratories. A larger follow-up EQA should, however, improve on defining the variables and format of the report. Additionally, contamination and/or minority variants should be a further aspect of assessment.
AB - This first pilot trial on external quality assessment (EQA) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) whole-genome sequencing, initiated by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Genomic and Molecular Diagnostics (ESGMD) and the Swiss Society for Microbiology (SSM), aims to build a framework between laboratories in order to improve pathogen surveillance sequencing. Ten samples with various viral loads were sent out to 15 clinical laboratories that had free choice of sequencing methods and bioinformatic analyses. The key aspects on which the individual centers were compared were the identification of (i) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and indels, (ii) Pango lineages, and (iii) clusters between samples. The participating laboratories used a wide array of methods and analysis pipelines. Most were able to generate whole genomes for all samples. Genomes were sequenced to various depths (up to a 100-fold difference across centers). There was a very good consensus regarding the majority of reporting criteria, but there were a few discrepancies in lineage and cluster assignments. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in variant calling. The main reasons for discrepancies were missing data, bioinformatic choices, and interpretation of data. The pilot EQA was overall a success. It was able to show the high quality of participating laboratories and provide valuable feedback in cases where problems occurred, thereby improving the sequencing setup of laboratories. A larger follow-up EQA should, however, improve on defining the variables and format of the report. Additionally, contamination and/or minority variants should be a further aspect of assessment.
KW - External quality assessment
KW - NGS
KW - Ring trial
KW - Whole-genome sequencing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122954298&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1128/JCM.01698-21
DO - 10.1128/JCM.01698-21
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 34757834
AN - SCOPUS:85122954298
SN - 0095-1137
VL - 60
JO - Journal of Clinical Microbiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Microbiology
IS - 1
M1 - e01698-21
ER -