Familial and sporadic human renal cell carcinoma: Evidence against a double-loss mechanism of carcinogenesis

Wilfred D. Stein*, Aryeh D. Stein

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

It has been speculated that renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an example of a double-loss mutation. We analyzed the age distribution of 71 cases of familial RCC and of 11 population-based cancer registries [German Democratic Republic, Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, U.S.A. Whites, U.S.A. Blacks, Miyagi and Osaka Prefectures (Japan), Hong Kong, and Israeli Jews] according to the multi-hit and clonal growth models of carcinogenesis. The analysis rules out a double-loss mechanism for RCC. On both of the two models analyzed, carcinogenesis in the familial cases of RCC arises as a result of a three- to ten-fold increase in the average rate of mutation at the susceptible loci, as compared with the sporadic cases. In general, the clonal growth model provides a somewhat better fit to the age-distribution of RCC incidence than does the multi-hit model.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)767-777
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume48
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1995

Keywords

  • Clonal growth model
  • Familial
  • Hereditary
  • Multi-hit models
  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • Sporadic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Familial and sporadic human renal cell carcinoma: Evidence against a double-loss mechanism of carcinogenesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this