Abstract
It has been speculated that renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an example of a double-loss mutation. We analyzed the age distribution of 71 cases of familial RCC and of 11 population-based cancer registries [German Democratic Republic, Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, U.S.A. Whites, U.S.A. Blacks, Miyagi and Osaka Prefectures (Japan), Hong Kong, and Israeli Jews] according to the multi-hit and clonal growth models of carcinogenesis. The analysis rules out a double-loss mechanism for RCC. On both of the two models analyzed, carcinogenesis in the familial cases of RCC arises as a result of a three- to ten-fold increase in the average rate of mutation at the susceptible loci, as compared with the sporadic cases. In general, the clonal growth model provides a somewhat better fit to the age-distribution of RCC incidence than does the multi-hit model.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 767-777 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1995 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Clonal growth model
- Familial
- Hereditary
- Multi-hit models
- Renal cell carcinoma
- Sporadic
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Familial and sporadic human renal cell carcinoma: Evidence against a double-loss mechanism of carcinogenesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver