Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Favorable safety outcomes of a perioperative propranolol and etodolac regimen in cancer patients in four randomized controlled trials

  • Nahida Sakis
  • , Liat Sorski
  • , Eden Asraf
  • , Itay Ricon-Becker
  • , Lee Shaashua
  • , Rita Haldar
  • , Bar Bruno Shvalbo
  • , Maytal Shabat-Simon
  • , Mordechai Gutman
  • , Aviram Nissan
  • , Ido Nachmany
  • , Ilan Kent
  • , Ron Pery
  • , Niv Pencovich
  • , Noam Shussman
  • , Nir Wasserberg
  • , Avraham Reshef
  • , Elchanan Quint
  • , Yifat Yosef Lishtzinsky
  • , Hanoch Kashtan
  • Moshe Shabtai, Baruch Brenner, Eran Sharon, Tanir Allweis, Nitzan Shahar, Anabel Eckerling, Elad Sandbank, Oded Zmora, Shamgar Ben-Eliyahu*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background – The perioperative use of the β-adrenergic blocker, propranolol, and/or the semi-selective COX-2 inhibitor, etodolac, has improved biomarkers of cancer metastasis in several small randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, the combined regimen showed potential to improve disease-free survival (DFS). Methods – We report data from our four RCTs including 148 patients with breast (n = 38), colorectal (n = 34 & n = 46), and pancreatic (n = 30) cancers. Treatment began 5 days pre-operatively, and continued for 5–30 postoperatively. Propranolol (slow-release) was initiated at 20mg twice daily (b.i.d), increased to 80mgb.i.d on surgery day, and gradually decreased thereafter to 20mgb.i.d. Etodolac was provided at 400mgb.i.d. The primary endpoints were perioperative safety outcomes, including adverse events (AEs) up to 30-day postoperatively, and 16 blood indices. Secondary outcomes were long-term oncological outcomes of 8-year DFS and overall survival (OS). Results – Bradycardia occurred in 12% of treated vs. 3% of placebo patients (p = 0.057), and was easily resolved by temporary withholding β-blockade. Weakness, nausea, pain, infection, bleeding, leakage, tissue-healing, or death were not significantly affected. Drug treatment promoted eosinophils in pancreatic cancer patients (p = 0.015), increased potassium (p = 0.013), and decreased albumin (p = 0.016) in CRC patients; however, these effects did not remain significant after false discovery rate (FDR) correction. In CRC, treatment improved 8-year DFS (2/15 vs. 9/18, p = 0.034), although this exploratory analysis was underpowered. Conclusion – These findings suggest the safety of this inexpensive and easy-to-implement perioperative propranolol and etodolac regimen in patients participating in these RCTs. Clinical Trial Registration – https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00502684, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00888797, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03919461, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03838029, identifier NCT00502684, NCT00888797, NCT03919461, NCT03838029.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1823113
JournalFrontiers in Pharmacology
Volume17
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2026 Sakis, Sorski, Asraf, Ricon-Becker, Shaashua, Haldar, Shvalbo, Shabat-Simon, Gutman, Nissan, Nachmany, Kent, Pery, Pencovich, Shussman, Wasserberg, Reshef, Quint, Lishtzinsky, Kashtan, Shabtai, Brenner, Sharon, Allweis, Shahar, Eckerling, Sandbank, Zmora and Ben-Eliyahu.

Keywords

  • COX2 inhibitors
  • etodolac
  • metastatic disease
  • non-selective B-blockers
  • perioperative care
  • propranolol
  • randomized controlled trial
  • safety

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Favorable safety outcomes of a perioperative propranolol and etodolac regimen in cancer patients in four randomized controlled trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this