TY - GEN
T1 - Finding corresponding objects when integrating several geo-spatial datasets
AU - Beeri, Catriel
AU - Doytsher, Yerach
AU - Kanza, Yaron
AU - Safra, Eliyahu
AU - Sagiv, Yehoshua
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - When integrating geo-spatial datasets, a join algorithm is used for finding sets of corresponding objects (i.e., objects that represent the same real-world entity). Algorithms for joining two datasets were studied in the past. This paper investigates integration of three datasets and proposes methods that can be easily generalized to any number of datasets. Two approaches that use only locations of objects are presented and compared. In one approach, a join algorithm for two datasets is applied sequentially. In the second approach, all the integrated datasets are processed simultaneously. For the two approaches, join algorithms are given and their performances, in terms of recall and precision, are compared. The algorithms are designed to perform well even when locations are imprecise and each dataset represents only some of the real-world entities. Results of extensive experiments show that one of the algorithms has the best (or close to the best) performances under all circumstances. This algorithm has a much better performance than applying sequentially the one-sided nearest-neighbor join.
AB - When integrating geo-spatial datasets, a join algorithm is used for finding sets of corresponding objects (i.e., objects that represent the same real-world entity). Algorithms for joining two datasets were studied in the past. This paper investigates integration of three datasets and proposes methods that can be easily generalized to any number of datasets. Two approaches that use only locations of objects are presented and compared. In one approach, a join algorithm for two datasets is applied sequentially. In the second approach, all the integrated datasets are processed simultaneously. For the two approaches, join algorithms are given and their performances, in terms of recall and precision, are compared. The algorithms are designed to perform well even when locations are imprecise and each dataset represents only some of the real-world entities. Results of extensive experiments show that one of the algorithms has the best (or close to the best) performances under all circumstances. This algorithm has a much better performance than applying sequentially the one-sided nearest-neighbor join.
KW - Corresponding objects
KW - Geospatial datasets
KW - Integration
KW - Location-based join
KW - Spatial join
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33644589200
U2 - 10.1145/1097064.1097078
DO - 10.1145/1097064.1097078
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.conference???
AN - SCOPUS:33644589200
SN - 9781595931467
T3 - GIS: Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
SP - 87
EP - 96
BT - GIS'05
PB - Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
T2 - 13th ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, ACM GIS 2005, Held in conjunction with the 14th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ACM-CIKM 2005
Y2 - 4 November 2005 through 5 November 2005
ER -