Abstract
Disadvantaged residents in contested cities often mistrust and resist official authorities due to historical deprivation. However, their urgent needs compel them to approach municipal bodies, both formally and informally, exhibiting ‘flexible compliance’. Through interviews with Palestinians and a public opinion survey in Jerusalem, we analysed the preferences of Jewish-Israeli and Palestinian residents for public goods provision. Results indicate that Palestinian residents prefer unofficial institutions, but this varies by location. Inner-city and outer-city East Jerusalem residents prefer the municipal government, while those beyond the separation wall favour the community councils. We elucidate flexible compliance and propose municipal tools to address it.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 22-41 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Territory, Politics, Governance |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords
- Jerusalem
- Legitimacy
- compliance
- contested cities
- utility
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Flexible compliance: utility and legitimacy in Jerusalem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver