TY - JOUR
T1 - Flexural response of a continental margin to sedimentary loading and lithospheric rupturing
T2 - The mountain ridge between the Levant Basin and the Dead Sea Transform
AU - Steinberg, J.
AU - Gvirtzman, Z.
AU - Garfunkel, Z.
PY - 2014/2
Y1 - 2014/2
N2 - During the past 37Myr the Levant Basin subsided under a 6km sedimentary section while the adjacent area, Israel's mountainous backbone (Judea Hills), emerged to an elevation of ∼1km above sea level. What was the flexural contribution of offshore loading to the inland uplift that was also affected at that time by widespread geodynamic heating and uplifting? This question becomes particularly challenging considering that in the middle of this period the lithosphere adjacent to the basin (100-200km east) ruptured and a new plate boundary was formed along the Dead Sea Transform (DST). How did this influence the strength of the lithosphere, and how did it change the shape of the flexure? We model the flexure caused by offshore sedimentary loading in two phases. The pre-DST phase applies a flexural solution for an elastic plate without lithospheric rupturing (infinite boundaries). The post-DST phase applies a flexural solution of an elastic plate with a free edge, set to resemble a lithosphere with no friction, and free to move vertically. The apparently unrealistic free edge simplification for a plate boundary provides an upper limit for the uplift. It is shown that before the initiation of the DST the flexural effect of the offshore loading on the inland region was negligible, and thus, most of the observed inland uplift should be explained in terms of deep-seated tectonic processes. On the contrary, the last phase of uplift postdating the formation of the DST was influenced by flexural loading offshore that was intensified near the plate edge.
AB - During the past 37Myr the Levant Basin subsided under a 6km sedimentary section while the adjacent area, Israel's mountainous backbone (Judea Hills), emerged to an elevation of ∼1km above sea level. What was the flexural contribution of offshore loading to the inland uplift that was also affected at that time by widespread geodynamic heating and uplifting? This question becomes particularly challenging considering that in the middle of this period the lithosphere adjacent to the basin (100-200km east) ruptured and a new plate boundary was formed along the Dead Sea Transform (DST). How did this influence the strength of the lithosphere, and how did it change the shape of the flexure? We model the flexure caused by offshore sedimentary loading in two phases. The pre-DST phase applies a flexural solution for an elastic plate without lithospheric rupturing (infinite boundaries). The post-DST phase applies a flexural solution of an elastic plate with a free edge, set to resemble a lithosphere with no friction, and free to move vertically. The apparently unrealistic free edge simplification for a plate boundary provides an upper limit for the uplift. It is shown that before the initiation of the DST the flexural effect of the offshore loading on the inland region was negligible, and thus, most of the observed inland uplift should be explained in terms of deep-seated tectonic processes. On the contrary, the last phase of uplift postdating the formation of the DST was influenced by flexural loading offshore that was intensified near the plate edge.
KW - Dead Sea Transform
KW - Levant
KW - Tertiary
KW - flexure
KW - inland uplift
KW - rigidity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894422928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/2013TC003330
DO - 10.1002/2013TC003330
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84894422928
SN - 0278-7407
VL - 33
SP - 166
EP - 186
JO - Tectonics
JF - Tectonics
IS - 2
ER -