Abstract
This study traces the origins and development of the story of Susanna by comparing the Old Greek (OG) and Theodotion (θ′) versions of Daniel, by employing a methodology that prioritizes shared textual elements to reconstruct the original literary core. OG offers a closer approximation of this core, with θ′ reflecting numerous secondary expansions. OG is characterized as a homily opening with a paraphrase of Isa 2:3, interpreted as a critique of Babylonian Jewish leadership. The homiletic conclusion includes a previously unrecognized allusion to Gen 25:27–28, reinforcing the youth–elder dichotomy as a central theme. θ′ transforms the homily into a narrative focused on Susanna’s exemplary character. This revision establishes Susanna as central protagonist while muting the youth–elder dichotomy. θ′ introduces new intertextual frameworks through allusions to biblical paradigms of sexual virtue. The study argues that OG was conceived as independent homiletical composition, while θ′ was rewritten as Daniel’s “origin story".
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 201-232 |
| Number of pages | 32 |
| Journal | Journal of Ancient Judaism |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Copyright Michael Segal, 2026. Published with license by Brill Schöningh. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.
Keywords
- Apocrypha
- Daniel
- Old Greek (OG)
- Septuagint
- Susanna
- Theodotion (θ′)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From Homily to Origin Story: The Textual and Literary Development of Susanna'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver