Abstract
We show that a meticulous design can encourage students in dyads to shift from informal reasoning (visual, inquiry-based) to reasoning moved by logical necessity (abductive and deductive). We describe a case study in which one dyad solves a series activities purposely designed. We show that argumentation first relies on intuition, and then intertwines the activities of conjecturing and checking the conjectures though the use of different gestures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 415-416 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| State | Published - 2010 |
| Event | 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2010 - Chicago, IL, United States Duration: 29 Jun 2010 → 2 Jul 2010 |
Conference
| Conference | 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2010 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | Chicago, IL |
| Period | 29/06/10 → 2/07/10 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From visualization to logical necessity, through argumentative design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver