Functional Ambidexterity of an Ancient Nucleic Acid-Binding Domain

Liam Longo*, Orit Weil-Ktorza, Segev Naveh-Tassa, Yael Fridmann-Sirkis, Dragana Despotović, Kesava Phaneendra Cherukuri, Tatsuya Corlett, Yaakov Levy, Norman Metanis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The helix-hairpin-helix (HhH) motif is an ancient and ubiquitous nucleic acid-binding element that has emerged as a model system for studying the evolution of dsDNA-binding domains from simple peptides that phase separate with RNA. We analyzed the entire putative evolutionary trajectory of the HhH motif – from a flexible peptide to a folded domain – for functional robustness to total chiral inversion. Against expectations, functional ‘ambidexterity’ was observed for both the phase separation of HhH peptides with RNA and binding of the duplicated (HhH)2-Fold to dsDNA. Moreover, dissociation kinetics, mutational analysis, and molecular dynamics simulations revealed overlap between the binding modes adopted by the natural and mirror-image proteins to natural dsDNA. The similarity of several dissociation phases upon chiral inversion may reflect the history of (HhH)2-Fold binding, with the ultimate emergence of a high-affinity binding mode, supported by a bridging metal ion, depopulating but not displacing more primitive (potentially ambidextrous) modes. These data underscore the surprising functional robustness of the HhH protein family and suggest that the veil between worlds with alternative chiral preferences may not be as impenetrable as is often assumed.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAngewandte Chemie - International Edition
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Keywords

  • chemical protein synthesis
  • mirror-image protein
  • Native Chemical Ligation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Functional Ambidexterity of an Ancient Nucleic Acid-Binding Domain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this