TY - JOUR
T1 - Fuzzy legality and national styles of regulation
T2 - Government intervention in the israel downstream oil market
AU - Cohn, Margit
PY - 2002/1
Y1 - 2002/1
N2 - This article examines the role of statute law in regulation and government intervention through a detailed historical case study of a crucial retail market. The history of state intervention in the Israeli oil supply market is dominated by “fuzzy legality,” a concept expounded in a former article. Legal fuzziness allowed the industry, acting in concert with the government regulator, to retain a lucrative, practically non–accountable arrangement in changing politico–economic climates. Three central forces encouraged continuing fuzziness: a “cloud” of state security, institutional stickiness that preserved colonial mandatory legal structures, and a prevalent national culture of nonlegalism. The article ends with a careful suggestion regarding the Israeli national style of regulation. Compared to American “adversarial legalism,” and its opposite, “consensual nonlegalism” the Israeli style may be termed “adversarial nonlegalism,” and holds less promise for balancing market and public interests. Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2002.
AB - This article examines the role of statute law in regulation and government intervention through a detailed historical case study of a crucial retail market. The history of state intervention in the Israeli oil supply market is dominated by “fuzzy legality,” a concept expounded in a former article. Legal fuzziness allowed the industry, acting in concert with the government regulator, to retain a lucrative, practically non–accountable arrangement in changing politico–economic climates. Three central forces encouraged continuing fuzziness: a “cloud” of state security, institutional stickiness that preserved colonial mandatory legal structures, and a prevalent national culture of nonlegalism. The article ends with a careful suggestion regarding the Israeli national style of regulation. Compared to American “adversarial legalism,” and its opposite, “consensual nonlegalism” the Israeli style may be termed “adversarial nonlegalism,” and holds less promise for balancing market and public interests. Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2002.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040410969&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1467-9930.00127
DO - 10.1111/1467-9930.00127
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85040410969
SN - 0265-8240
VL - 24
SP - 51
EP - 88
JO - Law and Policy
JF - Law and Policy
IS - 1
ER -