Gender and Cultural Differences in the Development of Reciprocity in Young Children

Avi Benozio*, Bailey R. House, Michael Tomasello

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A foundational mechanism underlying human cooperation is reciprocity. In the context of repeated interactions with others, it is not always clear the degree to which in-kind responses reflect responsiveness to partners’ prior behaviors (“reactive” responses), an interest unrelated to the partner (“nonreactive” responses), or any combination of the two. To disentangle these two types of responses, we presented children with sequential, one-shot, and costly interactions between themselves and either egalitarian or selfish peers. Study 1 tested direct, generalized, and normative reciprocal scenarios (N = 144 seven-year-old German children; 50% girls and 50% boys), finding that “nonreactive” responses were dominant for boys and manifested in the form of “selfish” resource distribution. Among girls, “reactive” responses were dominant and manifested in the form of in-kind resource distribution. Study 2 addressed even younger German children (N = 144; 4- to 8-year-old German children; 50% girls and 50% boys), exposing the same phenomenon among 4-year-olds, but not among 5.5-year-olds. Study 3 addressed 7-year-old Israeli children (N = 95; 49% girls and 51% boys), and replicated the basic phenomenon, with an additional cultural variation. The early emergence of gender differences in reciprocity and implications are discussed in cultural, sociodevelopmental, and evolutionary accounts.

Original languageEnglish
JournalDevelopmental Psychology
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Psychological Association

Keywords

  • cooperation
  • culture
  • early childhood
  • gender
  • reciprocity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender and Cultural Differences in the Development of Reciprocity in Young Children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this