Giving Practical Reasons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


I am writing a mediocre paper on a topic you are not particularly interested in. You don't have, it seems safe to assume, a (normative) reason to read my draft. I then ask whether you would be willing to have a look and tell me what you think. Suddenly you do have a (normative) reason to read my draft. By my asking, I managed to give you the reason to read the draft. What does such reason-giving consist in? And how is it that we can do it? In this paper, I characterize what I call robust reason giving, the kind present in requests. I distinguish it from epistemic and merely triggering reason-giving, I discuss in detail the phenomenology of robust reason-giving, and I offer an analysis of robust reason-giving in terms of the complex intentions of the reason-giver and of the normative background.
Original languageAmerican English
JournalPhilosopher's Imprint
Issue number4
StatePublished - Mar 2011


Dive into the research topics of 'Giving Practical Reasons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this