Abstract
The seminal work of Goldreich and Krawczyk (SIAM Journal on Computing) shows that any constant-round public-coin interactive proof for languages not in BPP cannot be black-box zero knowledge. Their result says nothing, however, about proofs (or arguments) of knowledge for languages in BPP. As a special case, their work leaves open the question of whether Schnorr's protocol for proving knowledge of discrete logarithms in cyclic groups is black-box zero knowledge.
In this work we focus on the zero knowledge of proofs of knowledge, centering on Schnorr's protocol as a prominent example.
In this work we focus on the zero knowledge of proofs of knowledge, centering on Schnorr's protocol as a prominent example.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | IACR Communications in Cryptology |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 8 Apr 2025 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Goldreich-Krawczyk Revisited: A Note on the Zero Knowledge of Proofs of Knowledge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver