Governing Heterogeneous Populations: ‘Separate and Unequal’ in Israel

Avi Shoshana*, Limor Samimian-Darash

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Drawing on the Israeli ‘Immanuel Affair’ (also called the ‘Israeli Brown Affair’), we examine the complex relationship between governmentality and population compositions. In the town of Immanuel, the State attempted to establish a homogeneous population of ultra-orthodox Jews by opening it to unrestricted settlement. Rather than homogeneity however, this strategy produced a divided community, whose Ashkenazi and Mizrahi residents barely interact, and the State responded by withdrawing from its governance. Contrary to the perception prevalent in the literature on governmentality, which refers to the governed population as a homogeneous body, this case invites inquiry into forms of governing in multi-population situations whose radical heterogeneity resists the State’s homogenization attempts. We argue that examining governmentality through management of events (or Foucault’s notion of ‘the milieu’) – like the Immanuel Affair – allows for greater appreciation of the interaction between complex governance mechanisms and heterogenic populations.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)1139-1155
Number of pages17
JournalSociology
Volume48
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 Dec 2014

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2014.

Keywords

  • governmentality
  • heterogeneity
  • population
  • ultra-orthodox

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Governing Heterogeneous Populations: ‘Separate and Unequal’ in Israel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this