Abstract
As sites where social media corporations profess their commitment to principles like community and free speech, policy documents function as boundary objects that navigate diverse audiences, purposes, and interests. This article compares the discourse of values in the Privacy Policies, Terms of Service, and Community Guidelines of five major platforms (Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter, and TikTok). Through a mixed-methods analysis, we identified frequently mentioned value terms and five overarching principles consistent across platforms: expression, community, safety, choice, and improvement. However, platforms limit their burden to execute these values by selectively assigning responsibility for their enactment, often unloading such responsibility onto users. Moreover, while each of the core values may potentially serve the public good, they can also promote narrow corporate goals. This dual framing allows platforms to strategically reinterpret values to suit their own interests.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 6658-6677 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | New Media and Society |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2023.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- TikTok
- YouTube
- boundary objects
- platform policies
- values
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Governing principles: Articulating values in social media platform policies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver