Gradable possibility and epistemic comparison

Elena Herburger*, Aynat Rubinstein

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

While some modals readily appear in comparative constructions and are clearly gradable (e.g., likely as in p is more likely than q), the gradablity of possibility modals (e.g., possible) is controversial. We argue that one of the major reasons to think that possibility modals can be graded, namely the appearance of German possibility modals like möglich ‘possible’ and kann ‘can’ in a special comparative construction involving eher, does not withstand closer scrutiny. We argue that eher is not a simple comparative marker and propose an analysis of eher möglich in which degrees of epistemic commitment are compared, not degrees of possibility. Our analysis explains similarities between eher and epistemic modals in terms of individual orientation, inference, and interaction with attitude predicates. Certain striking similarities between eher and METALINGUISTIC COMPARATIVES are discussed, with notable differences in modality type and distribution arguing against the conflation of these two constructions and contributing to a deeper understanding of special comparative constructions across languages.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)165-191
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Semantics
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Feb 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gradable possibility and epistemic comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this