Abstract
Motivated by our respective intuition about our need for a place called "home," we engaged in methodological bricolage to study the concept. We draw upon methodological traditions of constructivist grounded theory methodology (CHARMAZ, 2006; CHARMAZ & KELLER, 2016) and duoethnography (NORRIS & SAWYER, 2012) to envision and conduct a grounded duoethnography. Ultimately positioning the methodology within a constructivist paradigm, we nevertheless draw upon the complexities of postmodernism and poststructuralism, specifically as invoked in CLARKE's (2009, 2019) situational analysis and NORRIS and SAWYER's (2012) application of Bakhtinian dialogue to create a shared narrative through the exploration of the convergences and divergences of our experiences and expertise. Through these dialogues we identify core concepts related to "home." We elaborate on the background and application of this methodology and briefly describe an example to demonstrate how these concepts have sensitized us as scholars.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 17 |
Journal | Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021, Institut für Qualitative Forschung,Internationale Akademie Berlin gGmbH. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Bricolage
- Constructivist grounded theory methodology
- Duoethnography
- Grounded duoethnography
- Qualitative methodology
- Sensitizing concepts