Grouping and association in contingency tables: An exploratory canonical correlation approach

Zvi Gilula*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

The criteria of homogeneity and structure were proposed by Goodman (1981a) for determining whether certain rows or columns of a contingency table should be grouped. A data-based procedure (using the canonical form of bivariate distributions) is presented in this article to guide exploratory analysis to determine which rows or columns of a table may be grouped. This procedure facilitates the application of the homogeneity criterion. Relationships between the proposed method of grouping and the structural criterion are discussed as well as simultaneous inference for grouped tables. The grouping method is extended to multiway tables. The use of canonical forms as a model exploratory tool is addressed. Examples are discussed in detail.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)773-779
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Statistical Association
Volume81
Issue number395
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1986

Keywords

  • Association models
  • Canonical correlations
  • Canonical scores
  • Homogeneity criterion
  • Structural criterion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Grouping and association in contingency tables: An exploratory canonical correlation approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this