Guided bone regeneration in the treatment of segmental diaphyseal defects: A comparison between resorbable and non-resorbable membranes

Nicola Joseph Nasser; Adi Friedman; Michael Friedman; Eitan Moor; Rami Mosheiff

doi:10.1016/j.injury.2005.05.015

Guided bone regeneration in the treatment of segmental diaphyseal defects: A comparison between resorbable and non-resorbable membranes

Nicola Joseph Nasser
, Adi Friedman
, Michael Friedman
, Eitan Moor
, Rami Mosheiff^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

School of Pharmacy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study compares non-absorbable, ethyl cellulose (EC) membranes and absorbable, chitosan (CH) membranes in a rabbit model. Bone regeneration, evaluated by radiological and pathological parameters, was seen in both groups. In the EC group the process was faster but was followed by a sharp decrease, whereas in the CH group it was slower and continuous.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1460-1466
Number of pages	7
Journal	Injury
Volume	36
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2005.05.015
State	Published - Dec 2005

Keywords

Chitosan
Critical size bone defect
Ethyl cellulose
Guided bone regeneration

Access to Document

10.1016/j.injury.2005.05.015

Cite this

@article{9a739ffc77224236a73801f21b230edb,

title = "Guided bone regeneration in the treatment of segmental diaphyseal defects: A comparison between resorbable and non-resorbable membranes",

abstract = "This study compares non-absorbable, ethyl cellulose (EC) membranes and absorbable, chitosan (CH) membranes in a rabbit model. Bone regeneration, evaluated by radiological and pathological parameters, was seen in both groups. In the EC group the process was faster but was followed by a sharp decrease, whereas in the CH group it was slower and continuous.",

keywords = "Chitosan, Critical size bone defect, Ethyl cellulose, Guided bone regeneration",

author = "Nasser, \{Nicola Joseph\} and Adi Friedman and Michael Friedman and Eitan Moor and Rami Mosheiff",

year = "2005",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1016/j.injury.2005.05.015",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "36",

pages = "1460--1466",

journal = "Injury",

issn = "0020-1383",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guided bone regeneration in the treatment of segmental diaphyseal defects

T2 - A comparison between resorbable and non-resorbable membranes

AU - Nasser, Nicola Joseph

AU - Friedman, Adi

AU - Friedman, Michael

AU - Moor, Eitan

AU - Mosheiff, Rami

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - This study compares non-absorbable, ethyl cellulose (EC) membranes and absorbable, chitosan (CH) membranes in a rabbit model. Bone regeneration, evaluated by radiological and pathological parameters, was seen in both groups. In the EC group the process was faster but was followed by a sharp decrease, whereas in the CH group it was slower and continuous.

AB - This study compares non-absorbable, ethyl cellulose (EC) membranes and absorbable, chitosan (CH) membranes in a rabbit model. Bone regeneration, evaluated by radiological and pathological parameters, was seen in both groups. In the EC group the process was faster but was followed by a sharp decrease, whereas in the CH group it was slower and continuous.

KW - Chitosan

KW - Critical size bone defect

KW - Ethyl cellulose

KW - Guided bone regeneration

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/27744531942

U2 - 10.1016/j.injury.2005.05.015

DO - 10.1016/j.injury.2005.05.015

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???

C2 - 16243336

AN - SCOPUS:27744531942

SN - 0020-1383

VL - 36

SP - 1460

EP - 1466

JO - Injury

JF - Injury

IS - 12

ER -

Guided bone regeneration in the treatment of segmental diaphyseal defects: A comparison between resorbable and non-resorbable membranes

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this