Abstract
Research on judgement under uncertainty shows that people often fail to behave according to normative principles. Reviewing three judgemental heuristics and two choice heuristics that more accurately describe people’s actual behaviour, we comment on the relation between heuristics and biases and on the new framework of dual processes contrasting intuitive and deliberative judgement (cf., Kahneman Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2011). Presenting strategy research focused on heuristics, we highlight the possible role that the dual approach can play in studying strategic decision-making.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media |
| Pages | 668-671 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781137007728 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781137491909 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Heuristics and Biases and Strategic Decision-Making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver