How best to define antisemitism? A structural approach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the current discussion about definitions of antisemitism, the empirical social sciences have been marginalized. Groups of well-intentioned experts make decisions without considering the real-life experiences and perceptions of Jewish people—those who are impacted by antisemitism. I advocate returning the decision to the people, attributing greater weight in defining antisemitism to the actual perceptions of the victims—bottom-up rather than top-down. As a basis for a valid definition, we need to demonstrate these perceptions empirically. This paper presents a structural analysis of the 2018 Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA) Survey. The study, conducted through the internet, included over 16,000 self-identified Jews in 12 European Union countries. I review the findings regarding the main contents of antisemitic expressions, the channels of transmission of antisemitism, and the identity of perpetrators. Using Similarity Structure Analysis (SSA), I suggest a new and better analytic typology of the main patterns of perceptions of contemporary antisemitism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-42
Number of pages39
JournalAntisemitism Studies
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

RAMBI Publications

  • Rambi Publications
  • Fundamental Rights Agency (European Union)
  • European Union -- Agency for Fundamental Rights
  • Antisemitism -- Historiography
  • Antisemitism -- History -- 21st century

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How best to define antisemitism? A structural approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this