TY - JOUR
T1 - How the mouse got his roar
T2 - The shift to an offensive-defensive military strategy in israel in 1953 and its implications
AU - Oren, Amiram
AU - Barak, Oren
AU - Shapira, Assaf
PY - 2013/4/1
Y1 - 2013/4/1
N2 - In 1953 Israel abandoned the defensive-offensive military strategy that it had adopted four years earlier, in the wake of the First Arab-Israeli War, in favor of an offensive-defensive military strategy that, to a large extent, persists until this day. This paper, which employs previously untapped Israeli official documents, personal interviews, memoirs, biographies, and secondary sources, casts new light on this critical juncture in the history of Israel and the Arab-Israeli conflict. The paper challenges existing works by showing when and how Israel's offensive-defensive military strategy was adopted. More specifically, the authors argue that it was the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), especially its planning bodies-and not the Prime Minister and Defense Minister, David Ben Gurion, or the IDF's Chief of Staff, Lieutenant General Moshe Dayan-that initiated this change, and that the new strategy met no objection when it was discussed and approved by the Israeli government. The authors also inquire about the possible implications of this change for Israel and the Arab-Israeli conflict, and ask how this case informs general debates regarding the origins of military strategies.
AB - In 1953 Israel abandoned the defensive-offensive military strategy that it had adopted four years earlier, in the wake of the First Arab-Israeli War, in favor of an offensive-defensive military strategy that, to a large extent, persists until this day. This paper, which employs previously untapped Israeli official documents, personal interviews, memoirs, biographies, and secondary sources, casts new light on this critical juncture in the history of Israel and the Arab-Israeli conflict. The paper challenges existing works by showing when and how Israel's offensive-defensive military strategy was adopted. More specifically, the authors argue that it was the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), especially its planning bodies-and not the Prime Minister and Defense Minister, David Ben Gurion, or the IDF's Chief of Staff, Lieutenant General Moshe Dayan-that initiated this change, and that the new strategy met no objection when it was discussed and approved by the Israeli government. The authors also inquire about the possible implications of this change for Israel and the Arab-Israeli conflict, and ask how this case informs general debates regarding the origins of military strategies.
KW - Arab-Israeli conflict
KW - Israel
KW - civil-military relations
KW - existential threats
KW - military strategy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880230795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07075332.2012.761142
DO - 10.1080/07075332.2012.761142
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84880230795
SN - 0707-5332
VL - 35
SP - 356
EP - 376
JO - International History Review
JF - International History Review
IS - 2
ER -