HOW TO THEORIZE ABOUT STATISTICAL EVIDENCE (AND REALLY, ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE): A COMMENT ON ALLEN

David Enoch*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

In responding to Prof. Allen’s paper, I make several general methodological points: about the use of hypothetical cases, about the point of theorizing, and about the role of idealization. Then I make some more specific points about his claims about (and against) previous work on statistical evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)285-298
Number of pages14
JournalQuaestio Facti
Volume2021
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, University of Girona. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • legal epistemology
  • legal theory
  • statistical evidence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'HOW TO THEORIZE ABOUT STATISTICAL EVIDENCE (AND REALLY, ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE): A COMMENT ON ALLEN'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this