Human guidance of synchronous e-discussions: The effects of different moderation scripts on peer argumentation

Baruch B. Schwarz*, Christa S.C. Asterhan, Julia Gil

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Researchers and educators have considered synchronicity as a less desirable mode of communication than a-synchronicity in learning tasks involving discussions. This is because synchronicity does not easily allow students to take into consideration collaborative scripts in the heat of discussions. Also, moderation by teachers of synchronous discussions has been considered as extremely challenging so far. We describe here a study in which we trained students-teachers to moderate synchronous discussions and asked them to moderate discussions in two different ways of guidance, social and argumentation guidance. We show that moderation of synchronous discussions is feasible as effects of moderation on argumentative, social and interactive aspects of the discussion reflect the kind of guidance suggested. Also we show differences between girls and boys in the way they participate in synchronous discussions and respond to the moderator's suggestions.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComputer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices, CSCL 2009 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference
Pages497-506
Number of pages10
StatePublished - 2009
Event9th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2009, CSCL 2009 - Rhodes, Greece
Duration: 8 Jun 200913 Jun 2009

Publication series

NameComputer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices, CSCL 2009 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference

Conference

Conference9th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2009, CSCL 2009
Country/TerritoryGreece
CityRhodes
Period8/06/0913/06/09

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Human guidance of synchronous e-discussions: The effects of different moderation scripts on peer argumentation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this