Hypothetical consent and the value(s) of autonomy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations


Hypothetical consent is puzzling.Onthe one hand, it seems tomake amoral difference across a wide range of cases. On the other hand, there seem to be principled reasons to think that it cannot. In this article I put forward reasonably precise formulations of these general suspicions regarding hypothetical consent; I draw several distinctions regarding the ways in which hypothetical consent may make a moral difference; I distinguish between two autonomy-related concerns, nonalienation and sovereignty; and, utilizing these distinctions, I show that-and in a preliminary way, when-the objections to the moral significance of hypothetical consent fail.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)6-36
Number of pages31
Issue number1
StatePublished - Oct 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.


Dive into the research topics of 'Hypothetical consent and the value(s) of autonomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this