Abstract
Using data from 88 samples from 40 countries, the authors reevaluate the propositions of a recent values theory and provide criteria for identifying what is culture-specific in value meanings and structure. They confirm the widespread presence of 10 value types, arrayed on a motivational continuum, and organized on virtually universal, orthogonal dimensions: Openness to Change versus Conservation and Self-Transcendence versus Self-Enhancement. Forty-four values demonstrate high cross-cultural consistency of meaning. In the average sample, about 16% of single values diverge from their proto-typical value types, and one pair of motivationally close value types is intermixed. Test-retest and randomly split sample analyses reveal that some two thirds of deviations represent unreliable measurement and one third represent culture-specific characteristics. Ways to identify and interpret the latter are presented.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 92-116 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1995 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver