TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of surgery for stage IA non-smallcell lung cancer on patient quality of life
AU - International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP) investigators
AU - Schwartz, Rebecca M.
AU - Yip, Rowena
AU - Olkin, Ingram
AU - Sikavi, Daniel
AU - Taioli, Emanuela
AU - Henschke, Claudia
AU - Yankelevitz, David F.
AU - Xu, Dongming
AU - Salvatore, Mary
AU - Flores, Raja
AU - Wolf, Andrea
AU - McCauley, Dorothy I.
AU - Chen, Mildred
AU - Libby, Daniel M.
AU - Smith, James P.
AU - Pasmantier, Mark
AU - Altorki, Nasser
AU - Reeves, A. P.
AU - Markowitz, Steven
AU - Miller, Albert
AU - Deval, Jose Cervera
AU - Roberts, Heidi
AU - Patsios, Demetris
AU - Sone, Shusuke
AU - Hanaoka, Takaomi
AU - Zulueta, Javier
AU - De Torres, Juan
AU - Lozano, Maria D.
AU - Aye, Ralph
AU - Manning, Kristin
AU - Bauer, Tomas
AU - Canitano, Stefano
AU - Giunta, Salvatore
AU - Cole, Enser
AU - Klingler, Karl
AU - Austin, John H.M.
AU - Pearson, Gregory D.N.
AU - Shaham, Dorith
AU - Aylesworth, Cheryl
AU - Meyers, Patrick
AU - Andaz, Shahriyour
AU - Vafai, Davood
AU - Naidich, David
AU - McGuinness, Georgeann
AU - Sheppard, Barry
AU - Rifkin, Matthew
AU - Torsen, M. Kristin
AU - Hansen, Richard
AU - Kopel, Samuel
AU - Mayfeld, William
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Frontline Medical Communications.
PY - 2016/1
Y1 - 2016/1
N2 - Background There is a paucity of literature comparing quality of life (QoL) before and after surgery in stage IA lung cancer, where surgical resection is the recommended curative treatment. Objective To assess the impact of surgery on physical and mental health-related QoL in patients with stage IA lung cancer treated with surgical resection. Methods Participants in the I-ELCAP cohort who were diagnosed with their frst primary pathologic stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer, underwent surgery, and provided follow-up information on QoL 1 year later were included in the present analysis (N = 107). QoL information was collected using the SF-12 (12-item Short Form Health Survey), which generates 2 component scores related to mental health and physical health. Results Statistical analyses indicated that physical health QoL was signifcantly worsened from before surgery to after surgery, whereas mental health QoL marginally improved from before to after surgery. Physical health QoL worsened for women from baseline to follow-up, but not for men. Only lobectomy (not limited resection) had an impact on QoL from before to after surgery. Limitations Results are considered preliminary given the small sample size and multiple comparisons. Conclusions The current study fndings have implications for lung cancer health care professionals in regard to how they can most effectively present the possible impact of surgery on quality of life to this subset of patients in which disease has not yet signifcantly progressed.
AB - Background There is a paucity of literature comparing quality of life (QoL) before and after surgery in stage IA lung cancer, where surgical resection is the recommended curative treatment. Objective To assess the impact of surgery on physical and mental health-related QoL in patients with stage IA lung cancer treated with surgical resection. Methods Participants in the I-ELCAP cohort who were diagnosed with their frst primary pathologic stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer, underwent surgery, and provided follow-up information on QoL 1 year later were included in the present analysis (N = 107). QoL information was collected using the SF-12 (12-item Short Form Health Survey), which generates 2 component scores related to mental health and physical health. Results Statistical analyses indicated that physical health QoL was signifcantly worsened from before surgery to after surgery, whereas mental health QoL marginally improved from before to after surgery. Physical health QoL worsened for women from baseline to follow-up, but not for men. Only lobectomy (not limited resection) had an impact on QoL from before to after surgery. Limitations Results are considered preliminary given the small sample size and multiple comparisons. Conclusions The current study fndings have implications for lung cancer health care professionals in regard to how they can most effectively present the possible impact of surgery on quality of life to this subset of patients in which disease has not yet signifcantly progressed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962124886&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.12788/jcso.0205
DO - 10.12788/jcso.0205
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84962124886
SN - 2330-7749
VL - 14
SP - 37
EP - 44
JO - Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology
JF - Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology
IS - 1
ER -