Impact of the JOBS intervention on unemployed workers varying in risk for depression

Amiram D. Vinokur*, Richard H. Price, Yaacov Schul

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

194 Scopus citations

Abstract

Reports the results of the JOBS II randomized field experiment that included a sample of 1,801 recent job losers, 671 of which participated in a modified version of the JOBS I intervention for unemployed workers (Caplan, Vinokur, Price, & van Ryn, 1989). The intervention focused on enhancing the sense of mastery through the acquisition of job-search and problem-solving skills, and on inoculation against setbacks. JOBS II was intended to prevent poor mental health and to promote high quality reemployment. The study tested whether the efficacy of the intervention could be increased by screening and oversampling respondents who were at higher risk for a significant increase in depressive symptoms. Results demonstrated that the intervention primarily benefited the reemployment and mental health outcomes of the high-risk respondents. This suggests the feasibility of enhancing the efficacy of this preventive intervention by targeting, it for high-risk unemployed workers who could be identified prospectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-74
Number of pages36
JournalAmerican Journal of Community Psychology
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1995

Keywords

  • job loss
  • preventive intervention
  • reemployment
  • unemployment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of the JOBS intervention on unemployed workers varying in risk for depression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this