Impartiality and Realism: Reply to Mancuso

David Enoch

doi:10.1007/s11245-017-9493-5

Impartiality and Realism: Reply to Mancuso

David Enoch^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In Chapter 2 of Taking Morality Seriously, I put forward an argument for morality's objectivity that is based on the (purported) first-order implications of denying such objectivity. In her contribution to this volume, Mancuso criticizes that argument. This paper is a response to some of her main points.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	603-606
Number of pages	4
Journal	Topoi
Volume	37
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9493-5
State	Published - 1 Dec 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Keywords

Impartiality
Moral explanations
Moral realism
Objectivity

Access to Document

10.1007/s11245-017-9493-5

Cite this

@article{550f0ad3036f412ca17ec4de3601bd1a,

title = "Impartiality and Realism: Reply to Mancuso",

abstract = "In Chapter 2 of Taking Morality Seriously, I put forward an argument for morality's objectivity that is based on the (purported) first-order implications of denying such objectivity. In her contribution to this volume, Mancuso criticizes that argument. This paper is a response to some of her main points.",

keywords = "Impartiality, Moral explanations, Moral realism, Objectivity",

author = "David Enoch",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.",

year = "2018",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s11245-017-9493-5",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "37",

pages = "603--606",

journal = "Topoi",

issn = "0167-7411",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impartiality and Realism

T2 - Reply to Mancuso

AU - Enoch, David

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - In Chapter 2 of Taking Morality Seriously, I put forward an argument for morality's objectivity that is based on the (purported) first-order implications of denying such objectivity. In her contribution to this volume, Mancuso criticizes that argument. This paper is a response to some of her main points.

AB - In Chapter 2 of Taking Morality Seriously, I put forward an argument for morality's objectivity that is based on the (purported) first-order implications of denying such objectivity. In her contribution to this volume, Mancuso criticizes that argument. This paper is a response to some of her main points.

KW - Impartiality

KW - Moral explanations

KW - Moral realism

KW - Objectivity

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85019872181

U2 - 10.1007/s11245-017-9493-5

DO - 10.1007/s11245-017-9493-5

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???

AN - SCOPUS:85019872181

SN - 0167-7411

VL - 37

SP - 603

EP - 606

JO - Topoi

JF - Topoi

IS - 4

ER -

Impartiality and Realism: Reply to Mancuso

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this