TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving evaluation of anti-crime programs
T2 - Summary of a National Research Council report
AU - Lipsey, Mark
AU - Petrie, Carol
AU - Weisburd, David
AU - Gottfredson, Denise
PY - 2006/9
Y1 - 2006/9
N2 - This article summarizes a report of the National Research Council: Improving Evaluation of Anti-crime Programs. It is based on a workshop, held in September 2003, in which participants presented and discussed examples of evaluation-related studies that represent the methods and challenges associated with research at three levels: interventions directed toward individuals; interventions in neighborhoods, schools, prisons, or communities; and interventions at a broad policy level. The article, and the report on which it is based, is organized around five questions that require thoughtful analysis in the development of any evaluation plan: What questions should the evaluation address? When is it appropriate to conduct an impact evaluation? How should an impact evaluation be designed? How should the evaluation be implemented? What organizational infrastructure and procedures support high quality evaluation? The authors highlight major considerations in developing and implementing evaluation plans for criminal justice programs and make recommendations for improvement of government funded evaluation studies.
AB - This article summarizes a report of the National Research Council: Improving Evaluation of Anti-crime Programs. It is based on a workshop, held in September 2003, in which participants presented and discussed examples of evaluation-related studies that represent the methods and challenges associated with research at three levels: interventions directed toward individuals; interventions in neighborhoods, schools, prisons, or communities; and interventions at a broad policy level. The article, and the report on which it is based, is organized around five questions that require thoughtful analysis in the development of any evaluation plan: What questions should the evaluation address? When is it appropriate to conduct an impact evaluation? How should an impact evaluation be designed? How should the evaluation be implemented? What organizational infrastructure and procedures support high quality evaluation? The authors highlight major considerations in developing and implementing evaluation plans for criminal justice programs and make recommendations for improvement of government funded evaluation studies.
KW - Anti-crime programs
KW - Evaluation
KW - Experiments
KW - Impact evaluation
KW - Observational methods
KW - Quasi-experiments
KW - Randomized trials
KW - Research methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750510271&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11292-006-9009-6
DO - 10.1007/s11292-006-9009-6
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:33750510271
SN - 1573-3750
VL - 2
SP - 271
EP - 307
JO - Journal of Experimental Criminology
JF - Journal of Experimental Criminology
IS - 3
ER -