Abstract
In a recent paper Christopher Heath Wellman argues that - with some important qualifications - there are no procedural rights. And it's not as if he is squeamish about his examples: even someone who is convicted and punished by lottery is not wronged - their rights are not violated - if in fact they are guilty of the relevant crime. I respond, rejecting Wellman's conclusion and argument. I also show how the discussion has important wider implications.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 40-49 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Legal Theory |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Mar 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018.