Abstract
Progressive income taxation improves the relative consumption of the ill-endowed, but it may tend to reduce overall consumption by reducing the aggregate propensity to save and the capital-output ratio. This distinction between short- and long-run effects of progressive taxation parallels with the distinction between intragenerational and intergenerational equity. The possible conflict between these considerations, not unfamiliar in the literature on economic development, is analyzed here by means of a one-sector neoclassical growth model with the following features (Section II).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 138-149 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Quarterly Journal of Economics |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 1976 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Income taxation and capital accumulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver