TY - JOUR
T1 - INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN L2 LITERACY ACQUISITION
AU - Brice, Henry
AU - Siegelman, Noam
AU - Van Den Bunt, Mark
AU - Frost, Stephen J.
AU - Rueckl, Jay G.
AU - Pugh, Kenneth R.
AU - Frost, Ram
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©
PY - 2022/7/16
Y1 - 2022/7/16
N2 - Statistical learning (SL) approaches to reading maintain that proficient reading requires assimilation of rich statistical regularities in the writing system. Reading skills in developing first-language readers are predicted by individual differences in sensitivity to regularities in mappings from orthography to phonology (O-P) and semantics (O-S), where good readers rely more on O-P consistency, and less on O-S associations. However, how these regularities are leveraged by second-language (L2) learners remains an open question. We utilize an individual-differences approach, measuring L2 English learners' sensitivity to O-P, O-S, and frequency during word-naming, across two years of immersion. We show that reliance on O-P is leveraged by better readers, while reliance on O-S is slower to develop, characterizing less proficient readers. All factors explain substantial individual variance in L2 reading skills. These findings show how SL plays a key role in L2 reading development through its role in assimilating sublexical regularities between print and speech.
AB - Statistical learning (SL) approaches to reading maintain that proficient reading requires assimilation of rich statistical regularities in the writing system. Reading skills in developing first-language readers are predicted by individual differences in sensitivity to regularities in mappings from orthography to phonology (O-P) and semantics (O-S), where good readers rely more on O-P consistency, and less on O-S associations. However, how these regularities are leveraged by second-language (L2) learners remains an open question. We utilize an individual-differences approach, measuring L2 English learners' sensitivity to O-P, O-S, and frequency during word-naming, across two years of immersion. We show that reliance on O-P is leveraged by better readers, while reliance on O-S is slower to develop, characterizing less proficient readers. All factors explain substantial individual variance in L2 reading skills. These findings show how SL plays a key role in L2 reading development through its role in assimilating sublexical regularities between print and speech.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115196139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/s0272263121000528
DO - 10.1017/s0272263121000528
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85115196139
SN - 0272-2631
VL - 44
SP - 737
EP - 758
JO - Studies in Second Language Acquisition
JF - Studies in Second Language Acquisition
IS - 3
ER -